Trial reportScientific reports2026
Energy restriction and iron supplementation improve iron status in women with obesity regardless of red meat consumption: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06104800 (Effect of Weight Loss on Hepcidin Levels and Iron Status in Subjects With Obesity.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Weight Loss on Hepcidin Levels and Iron Status in Subjects With Obesity.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iron deficiency without anemia (IDNA) may be linked to obesity-related inflammation. Weight reduction and heme-iron intake from red meat are proposed to improve iron status. This randomized controlled trial (NCT06104800) assessed the impact of a low-calorie, high-protein diet with red meat (RM) compared to a low-calorie, high-protein diet without red meat (WR) over 60 days on iron concentrations in women with obesity and IDNA receiving oral iron supplementation. Fifty-two females were randomized (26 per group); 45 completed the study. After intervention, serum iron increased for both groups: RM 55.8 ± 27.0 µg/dL to 69.8 ± 30.5 µg/dL, p = 0.05; WR 65.3 ± 28.4 µg/dL to 76.8 ± 45.6 µg/dL, p = 0.27. However, group-by-time analysis showed no significant differences between dietary interventions (p = 0.55). Additional significant improvements (p < 0.05) in secondary and exploratory outcomes included ferritin, transferrin, unsaturated iron-binding capacity, uric acid, and fat mass. In conclusion, no statistically significant benefit of red meat consumption over other dietary iron sources, when combined with oral iron supplementation, was demonstrated for improving iron status in women with obesity and IDNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.