ArticleScientific reports2026
Cardiac systole is associated with enhanced go responding in an orthogonalized go/nogo task.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Action selection is traditionally thought to be governed by dual top-down control systems: a fast, affect-dependent controller and a slow, experience-driven controller. Emerging evidence indicates that bottom-up cardiac phase signals also contribute to action selection by facilitating (i.e., go) or suppressing (i.e., nogo) motor responses. Despite growing interest in cardiac-brain interactions, no prior study has examined whether cardiac phase effects on feedback-driven action decisions are modulated by appetitive and aversive motivational states. We conducted a secondary analysis of a go/nogo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset (n = 29), retrospectively determining the onset of decision cues relative to physiologically defined cardiac phases. We tested competing behavioural and computational hypotheses proposing that cardiac phase modulated action selection via motivational action biases, or through a general, affect-independent prepotent urge to act. Additionally, we performed an exploratory fMRI analysis to investigate neural activity underlying action decisions as a function of cardiac phase. Converging behavioural and computational evidence showed that systole was associated with a higher likelihood of go responding, independent of motivational action biases. Preliminary fMRI results further suggested that systolic facilitation of action was accompanied by diminished neural activity supporting action inhibition. Together, these findings extend existing evidence that cardiac phase impacts action decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.