Observational studyEvidence-based dentistry2026
Uncovering the hidden mutational landscape of the oral epithelium.
Observational study in Evidence-based dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
a commentary onLawson ARJ, et al. Somatic mutation and selection at the population scale. Nature. 2025;647(8089):411-420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09584-w .
designA cross-sectional observational cohort study using advanced genomic sequencing to map somatic mutations and clonal selection in normal human tissues at the population level
participantsThe authors used targeted NanoSeq, a duplex sequencing method achieving exceptionally low error rates (fewer than five errors per billion base pairs). The technique was applied to targeted capture of a 239-gene panel (0.9 Mb) in 1042 non-invasive buccal swab samples (median donor age 68 years, 79% female, 37% smokers) and 371 blood samples from the TwinsUK registry. DATA ANALYSIS: Mutation calling required strict duplex consensus filters. Gene-level selection was quantified using dNdScv, while site-level dN/dS analyses were used to identify recurrent hotspots and selected sites. Mutational signatures were deconvolved with sigfit, and multivariate mixed-effects regression modelled associations with age, smoking (pack-years), alcohol (drink-years), missing teeth, and other covariates.
resultsIn the oral epithelium, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) accumulated at 18.0 per cell per year and indels (insertions or deletions in the genome) at 2.0 per cell per year. Across all 1,042 participants, the authors detected 341,682 somatic mutations, including approximately 62,000 estimated driver mutations across 46 positively selected genes (e.g., NOTCH1 mutant cells reaching approximately 10% by ages 65-85 years, TP53 ~ 3%). Nine genes showed negative selection. Two dominant mutational signatures emerged: a clock-like signature A (resembling SBS1 and SBS5) and an alcohol associated signature B (resembling SBS16). The authors reported that smoking and alcohol were associated with higher mutation burdens, and that some effects on clonal selection were inferred from regression analyses; missing teeth (a marker of poor oral health) were independently associated with higher overall driver density. Driver frequencies for NOTCH1 were similar in normal epithelium and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), whereas TP53 was enriched in cancer.
conclusionsThe authors concluded that optimised NanoSeq enables population-scale mutational epidemiology in polyclonal tissues, revealing an extraordinarily rich landscape of positive and negative selection in normal oral epithelium. Environmental exposures shape mutagenesis and may also influence clonal selection, supporting a plausible mechanistic link between smoking, alcohol, and oral cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.