ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven risk assessment of hydrothermally altered goafs in deep metal mines via unsupervised typing and nonlinear evolution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the "Resource Lifeline" strategy of the China National Gold Group (CNGG) extends to greater depths, its subsidiary mines encounter severe challenges, primarily characterized by tectonic fracturing, intense hydrothermal alteration, and data scarcity. Crucially, traditional empirical stability classifications function as mere "static snapshots" that fail to capture the nonlinear accumulation of hidden hazards, rendering them ineffective for early warning in complex deep environments. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a data-driven stability assessment framework that seamlessly integrates unsupervised structural typing with nonlinear phenomenological evolution. Diverging from reliance on subjective experience, this study first extracts the intrinsic geometric features of 40 typical goafs using K-means clustering to establish an objective structural typology. Subsequently, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Entropy combined weighting model reveals that hydro-environmental factors account for over 50% of the total risk contribution, highlighting the overwhelming statistical significance of water-rock coupling in driving instability. To quantify the continuous progression from a metastable to a high-risk state, a non-linear dynamic evolution model based on the logistic map is introduced. By incorporating the comprehensive static risk index, this model effectively characterizes the nonlinear damage amplification process. The derived critical threshold (Rc = 0.57) accurately delineates high-risk zones, providing a transparent, quantitative paradigm for prioritizing the remediation of concealed hazards in data-scarce deep mining operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.