Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168340›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Smartphone movement data can reliably predict smoking lapses and cravings to enable timely smoking cessation support.

Maryam Abo-Tabik, Nicholas Costen, Yael Benn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam Abo-Tabik *Department of Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Nicholas CostenDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Yael Benn *School of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK. Y.Benn@mmu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research aiming to develop effective smoking interventions have identified triggers that contribute to failed quitting attempts including environmental (e.g. location), social (presence of other smokers), or internal (e.g. stress). Here, it is shown for the first time that passively collected movement data from smokers' smartphones' sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer) can be used to predict smoking-behaviour. Feeding the movement data into a Deep Learning (DL) model (1D-CNN-BiLSTM), smoking-behaviour was predicted with 85% accuracy within the subsequent 5-minute window. This compares to 63% accuracy when using traditional triggers (e.g. time of the day). Crucially, movement data can be used to predict high-craving incidents and lapses in the 3 months period following quitting smoking with similarly high accuracy, even when predictions are made without any personal data (i.e. when the model is trained using only data from other smokers). These findings can transform smoking-cessation apps, enabling the provision of just-in-time personalised support to those wishing to quit smoking. Importantly, the findings have implications beyond smoking-cessation applications, by revealing that human movements, largely overlooked to date, can be used for early detection of, and intervention for, health (and other) behaviours, including those that are not genetic or typically characterised by changes in movement.

Indexed as

CravingSmartphoneSmokingSmoking CessationDeep LearningHumansMobile ApplicationsMovement

Identifiers

PMID42168340
PMCPMC13194987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.