ArticleScientific reports2026
Linking compression mechanics and pressure redistribution in hybrid support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pressure ulcers are a major concern for individuals with limited mobility. This study developed six hybrid textile-based support surfaces as low-cost, non-electric alternatives for pressure redistribution. Each surface was constructed by layering cotton pile and spacer fabrics to achieve mechanical gradation and improved body conformity. Compression behavior and interface pressure distribution were systematically analyzed in supine and lateral postures using a proof-of-concept model. To ensure reliability, triplicate measurements were averaged after a 30-second stabilization period. The results demonstrated that higher compression work and elastic modulus were associated with lower peak interface pressures, while greater yield strain increased contact area and enhanced conformity. All investigated hybrid designs showed superior pressure redistribution performance compared to the control surface, effectively mitigating pressure concentration. These findings provide evidence-based design guidelines for affordable, ergonomically optimized support surfaces that can improve safety and quality of life for individuals at risk of pressure ulcers. By linking textile mechanics with clinical performance, this work advances the translation of textile engineering innovations into practical assistive technologies for institutional and home care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.