ArticleScientific reports2026
Factors contributing to musculoskeletal disorders and neck-trunk posture among Shiraz university of medical sciences students using Digimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal disorders are common among students exposed to prolonged sitting, and objective posture assessment is essential to clarify the contribution of ergonomic and environmental factors. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with neck and trunk posture using quantitative image-based analysis. In this descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study, 25 students from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were assessed. Neck and trunk angles were extracted from standardized lateral images using Digimizer software. Ergonomic compatibility between chairs and students' anthropometric characteristics was evaluated through a 12-item checklist. Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed using the Cornell questionnaire, and mental workload was measured by NASA-TLX. General and task lighting indices and luminance were recorded. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression were performed to determine predictors of posture angles. No significant associations were observed between demographic variables, lighting indices, mental workload, and neck or trunk angles (p > 0.05). In contrast, inappropriate seat height was associated with increased neck angle (p = 0.046), while insufficient seat width and lack of lower limb support were significantly related to increased trunk angle (p = 0.009 and p = 0.020). Trunk flexion was also associated with greater trunk angle (p = 0.035). Discomfort was most prominent in the neck and back regions. These findings indicate that postural deviations during study are primarily driven by chair design and anthropometric mismatch rather than lighting conditions or cognitive load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.