ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-optimized BPNN model for port safety risk prediction and management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of international port safety management, the traditional Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) model is confronted with bottlenecks including limited data processing capability and low optimization efficiency. This study proposes an intelligent prediction framework for port safety risks that integrates the Bald Eagle Search (BES) algorithm, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Fuzzy Logic System (FLS), aiming to improve the scientific nature of risk early warning and management efficiency. The framework employs CNN for feature extraction, uses the BES algorithm to conduct global parameter optimization for BPNN, and introduces FLS to handle uncertainty and fuzzy information. The results show that the proposed ensemble model achieves outstanding performance in the three-classification task of port safety risks, with the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) reduced to 0.012, the accuracy improved to 98.5%, and the Macro-F1 score reaching 0.982. Furthermore, the model inference latency is only 12.5 milliseconds, which fully demonstrates its application potential in real-time monitoring scenarios. Compared with traditional optimization algorithms, the proposed model has advantages in computational performance, and provides scientific decision support for port administrators by lowering the false alarm rate and enhancing emergency response speed. This study opens up a new approach for the practical application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the port safety domain, and carries important practical value for promoting the intelligent and precise transformation of port safety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.