Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168270›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Spatial proximity and scene grammar: shaping spatial representations for memory-guided actions in naturalistic environments.

Bianca R Baltaretu, Melissa L-H Võ, Katja Fiehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bianca R BaltaretuDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Strasse 10F, 35394, Giessen, Hesse, Germany. b.baltaretu@gmail.com.
Melissa L-H VõDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katja FiehlerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Strasse 10F, 35394, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial object representations are necessary for effective goal-directed actions. These representations can be produced with respect to the self (i.e., egocentrically) and/or to surrounding objects (i.e., allocentrically). For the latter, one (spatial) factor of influence is landmark proximity to target. This factor shapes allocentric representations and informs future memory-guided actions, in both impoverished and rich scenes. More recent work has suggested that cognitive factors (e.g., object semantics) can also influence allocentric coding. Here, we investigated how both spatial and cognitive factors affect allocentric coding in naturalistic environments. In a memory-guided virtual reality (VR) experiment, semantically-related targets (i.e., local objects, which are movable and manipulable, e.g. a cup) were presented on congruent or incongruent anchors (i.e., large, immovable objects, predictive of local object locations). After an imperceptible anchor shift (or not), a target had to be placed in its remembered position. Placement performance results indicated that anchors were, indeed, used to build up spatial target representations. Additionally, these representations showed strong effects of proximity-to-anchor, with no differential effects of phrase-level semantic congruency. Taken together, in our memory-guided task, we found that spatial proximity plays a dominant role in allocentric coding in naturalistic (virtual) scenes.

Indexed as

MemorySpace PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleSemanticsVirtual RealityYoung AdultMemory-guided actionScene perceptionScene semanticsSpatial codingSpatial proximityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42168270
PMCPMC13195109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.