ArticleScientific reports2026
Nebivolol as a potential adjunct therapy for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: evidence from a rat model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis frequently leads to cardiac dysfunction driven by oxidative stress (OS), inflammation, and conduction abnormalities. Nebivolol (NEB), a selective β1-blocker with vasodilatory and antioxidant properties, has shown organ-protective effects in sepsis, but its cardiovascular role remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of NEB in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced sepsis in rats. Thirty-two rats were assigned to four groups: Sham, NEB, CLP, and NEB + CLP. Hemodynamic parameters, ECG findings, cardiac and vascular OS markers, serum biochemistry, and histopathology were evaluated. CLP caused tachycardia, conduction disturbances, increased OS, and marked myocardial and aortic injury. NEB reduced heart rate, improved PR interval, and partially ameliorated oxidative and histological alterations. However, NEB did not improve blood pressure, myocardial edema, or aortic injury. NEB offered localized protection against sepsis-induced myocardial injury by modulating oxidative and inflammatory pathways. While these biochemical and histopathological improvements were significant, they were not accompanied by changes in systemic blood pressure or a complete reversal of all structural alterations during the acute phase. These findings support further investigation of NEB as a potential adjunctive therapy in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.