ArticleScientific reports2026
A deterministic method for quantifying spindle-shaped cells in noisy bright-field microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate quantification of spindle-shaped cells in bright-field microscopy remains challenging due to low contrast, noise, and highly variable cell morphology. Conventional approaches often rely on fluorescent staining or deep learning models, which may introduce phototoxic effects, require extensive training data, or offer limited interpretability. Here, we present a deterministic image analysis method for quantifying spindle-shaped cells directly from noisy bright-field microscopy images without the need for fluorescent labeling or supervised training. The proposed workflow combines contrast enhancement, adaptive thresholding, contour filtering, and shape-guided refinement to detect elongated cell bodies under challenging imaging conditions. The method is designed to be robust to irregular cell morphology and heterogeneous background commonly encountered in bright-field time-lapse microscopy. Quantitative evaluation demonstrates reliable cell counting and consistent performance across varying noise levels and imaging conditions. The approach achieves competitive accuracy while maintaining interpretability and low computational complexity, enabling straightforward integration into existing biomedical imaging workflows. By preserving cell morphology and avoiding fluorescent staining and complex model training, the method provides a practical solution for large-scale analysis of spindle-shaped cell populations in bright-field microscopy experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.