ArticleLight, science & applications2026
Theoretical framework for engineering Boltzmann luminescent nanothermometry.
Article in Light, science & applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Luminescent nanothermometry based on thermally coupled levels (TCLs) has emerged as a powerful tool for non-invasive temperature sensing, but it still lacks sufficient theoretical guidelines. To address this issue, a theoretical framework for Boltzmann luminescent nanothermometry has been established, which quantitatively defines the temperature window for establishing thermal equilibrium in TCLs, establishes a practical criterion for stable thermal coupling of TCLs, and enables predictive material design of temperature sensitivity. Based on this framework, a high sensitivity of 6.17% K
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.