Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42167878›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open diabetes research & care2026

Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylureas on kidney outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: a target trial emulation.

Stacey Sklepinski, Alexandria A Ratzki-Leewing, Jeph Herrin, Kavya Sindhu Swarna, Yihong Deng, Eric C Polley, Joshua J Neumiller, Rodolfo J Galindo, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Joseph S Ross and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05214573 (Second-line Therapies for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Cardiovascular Disease Risk), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05214573 completednot on this map

Second-line Therapies for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Cardiovascular Disease Risk

TypeobservationalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2021 to 2025Enrolled386,301ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Cardiac DiseaseArmsGlucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonist, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor, Sulfonylurea
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Stacey SklepinskiSchool of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3857-9445
Alexandria A Ratzki-LeewingDivision of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9474-7900
Jeph HerrinSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kavya Sindhu SwarnaMayo Clinic Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Yihong DengMayo Clinic Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Eric C PolleyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Joshua J NeumillerDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Rodolfo J GalindoDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Guillermo E UmpierrezDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-5026
Joseph S RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Juan P BritoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Victor M MontoriDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0595-2898
Mindy M MickelsonMayo Clinic Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rozalina Grubina McCoyDivision of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA rozalina.mccoy@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-3183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess the within-class variation in kidney outcomes following initiation of sulfonylurea therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe used claims data of enrollees in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and traditional Medicare health plans between 2014 and 2021 to emulate a target trial including adults ≥21 years with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk to compare initiation of glimepiride, glipizide, or glyburide on the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or worse, including initiation of kidney replacement therapy (primary outcome); secondary outcomes examined incident CKD stages 3-4, kidney failure (including kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and hypoglycemia requiring emergency department or hospital care. Random treatment assignment was emulated using propensity scores, estimated using the super learner ensemble method, and incorporated as inverse probability of treatment weights into proportional hazards models.

resultsThe weighted study cohort included 295 092 individuals starting glimepiride (n=134 926), glipizide (n=145 984), and glyburide (n=14 182). One year after treatment initiation, stage 3 or worse CKD developed in 2.1% of patients in the glimepiride group, 2.2% in the glipizide group, and 1.8% in the glyburide group. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of kidney complications compared with both glimepiride (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92) and glipizide (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89), despite a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.71 vs glipizide and HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.42 vs glimepiride). In contrast, the risk of kidney complications was modestly increased with glipizide compared with glimepiride use (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07).

conclusionsGlyburide was associated with a modestly lower risk of kidney complications, despite a higher risk of hypoglycemia, while glipizide was associated with a higher risk of kidney complications. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest important within-class differences that warrant consideration in clinical decision-making and future research. Despite rigorous prespecified causal inference analytic methods, the risk of unmeasured confounding and bias by indication with the use of observational data remains. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05214573.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSulfonylurea CompoundsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlipizideGlyburideHumansHypoglycemiaInsulin SecretagoguesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisglimepirideGlipizideGlyburideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin SecretagoguesSulfonylurea CompoundsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2GlyburideKidney Diseases

Identifiers

PMID42167878
PMCPMC13202062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.