ArticleOpen heart2026
Melatonin and cardiovascular risk: an NHANES reality check after recent heart failure concerns.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA large electronic health record study presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2025 reported a heart failure safety signal associated with long-term melatonin use among adults with insomnia. In parallel, melatonin use has increased in the US general population, making counselling questions increasingly common in cardiovascular practice. MAIN ARGUMENT: Observational associations between melatonin and cardiovascular outcomes are unusually vulnerable to confounding-by-indication, reverse causality, and exposure misclassification because melatonin uptake often reflects insomnia severity, depression or anxiety symptoms and healthcare utilisation. EVIDENCE ANCHOR: In a nationally representative NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) adult cohort (1999-2018), melatonin users differed markedly from non-users at baseline, particularly for sleep disturbance and depression. In updated survey-weighted, multiple-imputation models, recent melatonin use was not significantly associated with prevalent composite cardiovascular disease or heart failure. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating contextual counterpoint to recent alarm signals rather than causal evidence of benefit or harm.
conclusionAvailable observational data do not support strong claims of cardiovascular benefit, and they do not establish definitive cardiovascular harm or safety. Clinicians should document over-the-counter use, counsel pragmatically and prioritise evaluation and treatment of underlying sleep disorders while better evidence is developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.