Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42167688›Full record

SynthesisVirus research2026

Occurrence of Myocarditis in Patients Immunized with Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Juan Jose Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Laura Moyano Valarezo, Vicente Silva, Fernanda Delgado, Diego Nazar-Izquierdo, Alejandro Bruna-Mejias, Pablo Nova-Baeza, Mathias Orellana Donoso, Gustavo Oyanedel- Amaro, Gloria Cifuentes-Suazo and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Virus research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Juan Jose Valenzuela-FuenzalidaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile; Departamento de Ciencias Química y Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins, Santiago 8370993, Chile.
Laura Moyano ValarezoDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Vicente SilvaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Fernanda DelgadoDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Diego Nazar-IzquierdoDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Alejandro Bruna-MejiasDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Pablo Nova-BaezaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Mathias Orellana DonosoFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Lota 2465, Santiago 7510157, Chile; Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago 7501015, Chile.
Gustavo Oyanedel- AmaroFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Las Américas, 8370040, Santiago, Chile.
Gloria Cifuentes-SuazoFacultad de Medicina, Carrera de Odontología, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Av. Alonso de Ribera 2850, Concepción 4090541, Chile.
Maria P MoyaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile.
Juan Sanchis- GimenoGIAVAL Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Human Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
Marko KonschakeInstitute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI), Müllerstr. 59, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: marko.konschake@i-med.ac.at.
Jessica Paola Loaiza-GiraldoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Central del Valle del Cauca (UCEVA), Tuluá 763022, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocarditis has emerged as a rare but clinically relevant adverse event reported after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly following widespread use of vaccines based on novel molecular platforms. Given variability in vaccine technologies, population characteristics, and surveillance methodologies, a comprehensive quantitative synthesis is required to better characterize the occurrence of post-vaccination myocarditis. This study aimed to characterize the distribution of reported myocarditis cases among individuals receiving COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA, viral vector, and protein-subunit platforms, and to synthesize available evidence on reported post-vaccination myocarditis across different demographic and geographic subgroups.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251118332). MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and LILACS were searched from inception to January 2024 for observational studies reporting myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series were eligible. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Random-effects models were applied to estimate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic, and prespecified subgroup analyses were performed by sex, age, geographic region, and vaccine platform. Publication bias was explored using funnel plot analysis.

resultsFifty-nine studies comprising 196,478,861 vaccinated individuals and 13,348 reported myocarditis cases were included. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study designs and denominators, pooled estimates represent the proportion of myocarditis cases within reported samples rather than population-level incidence or risk. Across all included studies, the pooled proportion of myocarditis cases within reported study samples was 34% (95% CI: 19-50%), with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 100%). These estimates should not be interpreted as population-level incidence or risk. Reported myocarditis cases were more frequently observed among males (72%, 95% CI: 58-86%) than females (56%, 95% CI: 35-77%) and were predominantly identified in individuals younger than 40 years. Subgroup analyses by region and vaccine platform should be interpreted cautiously due to methodological variability and potential selection bias. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible small-study effects.

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize the distribution of reported myocarditis cases following COVID-19 vaccination rather than to estimate population-level incidence or risk. Although pooled proportions within reported samples were substantial, these estimates do not reflect population-level incidence. Available evidence suggests that myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination remains uncommon at the population level, predominantly affecting younger males and more commonly reported after mRNA-based vaccines. Most reported cases appear to follow a benign and self-limited clinical course. These findings support the overall favorable benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines while underscoring the need for continued pharmacovigilance and more robust epidemiological studies to better characterize the epidemiology of vaccine-associated myocarditis.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMyocarditisHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAdenoviral Vector VaccinesAdverse EventsCOVID-19 VaccinesMeta-AnalysismRNA VaccinesMyocarditisPharmacovigilanceSystematic ReviewVaccine Safety

Identifiers

PMID42167688
PMCPMC13231016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.