SynthesisVirus research2026
Occurrence of Myocarditis in Patients Immunized with Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Virus research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocarditis has emerged as a rare but clinically relevant adverse event reported after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly following widespread use of vaccines based on novel molecular platforms. Given variability in vaccine technologies, population characteristics, and surveillance methodologies, a comprehensive quantitative synthesis is required to better characterize the occurrence of post-vaccination myocarditis. This study aimed to characterize the distribution of reported myocarditis cases among individuals receiving COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA, viral vector, and protein-subunit platforms, and to synthesize available evidence on reported post-vaccination myocarditis across different demographic and geographic subgroups.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251118332). MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and LILACS were searched from inception to January 2024 for observational studies reporting myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series were eligible. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Random-effects models were applied to estimate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic, and prespecified subgroup analyses were performed by sex, age, geographic region, and vaccine platform. Publication bias was explored using funnel plot analysis.
resultsFifty-nine studies comprising 196,478,861 vaccinated individuals and 13,348 reported myocarditis cases were included. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study designs and denominators, pooled estimates represent the proportion of myocarditis cases within reported samples rather than population-level incidence or risk. Across all included studies, the pooled proportion of myocarditis cases within reported study samples was 34% (95% CI: 19-50%), with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 100%). These estimates should not be interpreted as population-level incidence or risk. Reported myocarditis cases were more frequently observed among males (72%, 95% CI: 58-86%) than females (56%, 95% CI: 35-77%) and were predominantly identified in individuals younger than 40 years. Subgroup analyses by region and vaccine platform should be interpreted cautiously due to methodological variability and potential selection bias. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible small-study effects.
conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize the distribution of reported myocarditis cases following COVID-19 vaccination rather than to estimate population-level incidence or risk. Although pooled proportions within reported samples were substantial, these estimates do not reflect population-level incidence. Available evidence suggests that myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination remains uncommon at the population level, predominantly affecting younger males and more commonly reported after mRNA-based vaccines. Most reported cases appear to follow a benign and self-limited clinical course. These findings support the overall favorable benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines while underscoring the need for continued pharmacovigilance and more robust epidemiological studies to better characterize the epidemiology of vaccine-associated myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.