ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026
Method Evaluation of Liquid Biopsy Proteomics for Limited Plasma Volume.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the biggest challenges in plasma proteomics is to reduce the dynamic range of plasma proteins to capture the expression of low-abundance proteins. Although abundant protein depletion and proximity extension assay are widely used for human samples, the application to animal species in non-clinical assessment remains limited. Here, we evaluated the Mag-Net and ENRICH-iST methods using 20 μl of plasma from both healthy and type 2 diabetes model rats. By combining with the optimized LC-MS method, Mag-Net identified more proteins than ENRICH-iST with high precision, although both methods identified over 5000 proteins. Using integrative proteomics and analytical approaches, including extracellular vesicle (EV) database comparison, Gene Ontology analysis, Simple Western, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and contamination assessments, we demonstrated in rat plasma that Mag-Net preferentially enriches EV proteins, whereas ENRICH-iST more evenly captures low-abundance proteins, including EV proteins. Regardless of the protein enrichment method employed, more than half of the tissue-specific proteins were classified as being specific to either the liver or the brain tissues. Whereas, several liver-specific proteins involved in protein-protein interactions, including Proz/Serpina10 and Ambp/Itih1/Itih2, were identified as exhibiting over a ten-fold increase in mean quantification values in the Mag-Net method compared to ENRICH-iST, suggesting enhanced enrichment of protein-protein interaction network. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified 219 downregulated and 80 upregulated proteins in the Mag-Net method dataset (fold change ≥ 1.5, p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.