ArticleInfant behavior & development2026
Assessing the feasibility of a wearable consumer device for capturing newborns' sleep patterns in naturalistic environments.
Article in Infant behavior & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Newborn sleep plays a vital role in early neurological and physiological development and may have lasting consequences for infants' developmental trajectories. However, few methods capture high-density sleep data in naturalistic settings during the newborn period. We address this by assessing the utility of the Owlet Dream Sock for capturing sleep patterns, timing, and duration in the home. Thirty-nine newborns (51.30% female, M age = 9.38 days old, SD = 6.40) wore the Owlet Dream Sock for fourteen days during all sleep periods. Newborns exhibited two common types of sleep bouts, light-only bouts (awake → light sleep → awake sequences) and full sleep cycles (awake → light sleep → deep sleep → light sleep → awake sequences). On average, sleep bouts began around 11:48 AM, and newborns spent approximately 172 monitoring minutes awake, 536 in light sleep, and 54 in deep sleep per day. The duration of time spent awake and in light sleep did not change over the assessment period; however, both the duration of deep sleep and the number of full sleep cycles increased each week. While nighttime sleep minutes did not change, daytime sleep minutes decreased. The Owlet Dream Sock shows acceptable feasibility for capturing high-density newborn sleep data to capture developmental changes in sleep patterns over the first weeks of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.