Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166790›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

Definition and Test-Retest Reliability of a Monitoring Method Integrating Accelerometric Actigraphy and Bluetooth Indoor Location Tracking Applied in a Long-Term Residential Unit for Persons With Dementia: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Marco Rabuffetti, Pietro Davide Trimarchi, Alessia Gallucci, Ilaria Carpinella, Elena Kisel, Maria Patrizia Andriani, Ennio De Giovannini, Gaia Bailo, Fabrizio Giunco, Maurizio Ferrarin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco RabuffettiIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0003-1638-7978
Pietro Davide TrimarchiIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-5261
Alessia GallucciIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0002-8520-674X
Ilaria CarpinellaIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0001-7486-0706
Elena KiselIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0009-0005-8106-6566
Maria Patrizia AndrianiIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0009-0005-6851-7879
Ennio De GiovanniniCentro Medico Riabilita Cooperativa Sociale Mano Amica Onlus, Schio, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-8381-0951
Gaia BailoIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0009-0004-4099-3569
Fabrizio GiuncoIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-8452
Maurizio FerrarinIRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Ente del Terzo Settore, via Capecelatro, 66, Milano, 20148, Italy, 39 3382509295, 39 0239210325.ORCID 0000-0002-7797-2399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dementia has an impact on the physical activities performed daily in a social context. Sleeping and resting, in general, are also affected by dementia. Monitoring techniques based on miniaturized wearable sensors and on sensorized environments allow for actigraphic recordings and location tracking. The availability of contemporaneous physical activities profile led to quantify, in the social actigraphy approach, the level of correlation between individuals living in the same environment. Objective: This study has two main objectives: (1) to define a methodology for actigraphic recordings, based on wearable accelerometers, and on location tracking, based on Bluetooth wearable technology, and to apply it in a well-defined social context, a long-term care residential unit for people with dementia; and (2) to quantify test-retest reliability of the indices obtained by the monitoring methodology. Methods: Persons with dementia living in the long-term care unit have been equipped with miniaturized wearable sensors, an accelerometer at their dominant wrist, and a Bluetooth beacon at their ankle for 7 days. The raw recordings allowed for computing indices related to physical activity intensities, to the occurrence of walking bouts, to the efficiency of sleep and waking phases, to social interactions between individuals, and to locations preferably occupied. The 7-day session was repeated at short (3 weeks) and long (3 months) terms in order to quantify the test-retest reliability of the indices. Results: Twenty-five persons with dementia were enrolled, 4 of them dropped out, and valid data were obtained, in the different sessions, from 19 to 21 individuals of the recruited group. Control data from 10 age-matched healthy participants were derived from published datasets. As a group, compared with age-matched healthy participants, persons with dementia showed a comparable duration of phases of no activity and of light activity (energy cost lower than 3 metabolic equivalents of tasks [METs]), a relevantly lower duration (-84.3%) of phases of moderate activity (energy cost ranging from 3 to 6 METs), and substantial absence (-100%) of phases of vigorous activity (larger than 6 METs); moreover, daytime and nighttime were characterized by comparable wake and sleep, respectively, efficiency; finally, as to the social interactions, persons with dementia showed a lower correlation of their motor activity profiles (-53.1%). The test-retest reliability was excellent for physical activity indices (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.98), good for social indices (0.65-0.67), excellent for sleep or wake efficiency (0.74-0.89), and fair for location tracking indices (0.37-0.78). Conclusions: The considered methodology, particularly concerning accelerometry, proved to be feasible, informative, and with a good to excellent test-retest reliability. Interestingly, the methodology clearly identified behaviors, such as wandering, in a minority of individuals inside this study's group of persons with dementia, thus supporting a possible clinical use of the methodology.

Indexed as

AccelerometryActigraphyDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLong-Term CareMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicReproducibility of ResultsWearable Electronic Devicesdementialocation trackinglong-term residency unitphysical activitysocial actigraphywearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID42166790
PMCPMC13193664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.