ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire for Chinese Outpatients: Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has rapidly expanded; however, standardized, telemedicine-specific patient-reported experience measures tailored to outpatient workflows are limited in many settings. Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire (TSEQ) for Chinese outpatients using telemedicine services. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey among outpatients who completed a telemedicine consultation at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between July 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021, and who had used telemedicine services, using an adapted Chinese Patient Experience Questionnaire that encompasses 15 questions across 4 dimensions, to investigate patients' telemedicine consultation experiences. Item generation was informed by a literature review, workflow mapping, and expert review. We evaluated the factor structure using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis on the full sample with cross-validation. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach α and item-total correlations. Results: In total, 3338 participants completed the survey (mean age 45.3, SD 17.8 y; n=2182, 65.4% female participants; n=1827, 54.8% with college education or above). The exploratory factor analysis of the final 14-item scale resulted in 4 factors. After scrutinizing the content, these factors were labeled "Service Efficiency," "Post-treatment," "Information Guidance," and "Humanistic Care," and they demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach α values of 0.876, 0.840, 0.962, and 0.876, respectively). Moreover, as the average variance extracted values were greater than 0.5 and the composite reliability values were greater than 0.7, the TSEQ scale has high convergent validity. Our findings suggest that the psychometric properties of the 14-item TSEQ are valid and reliable for assessing telemedicine service experience among Chinese outpatients. Conclusions: The TSEQ demonstrates a stable multidomain structure with satisfactory reliability and validity for evaluating outpatient telemedicine service experience in China. The instrument can support routine quality monitoring and guide targeted workflow improvements. Future studies should validate the TSEQ in multisite and postpandemic samples and examine measurement invariance across key subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.