Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166781›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Empowering Older Adults Through Values-Informed Solutions for Technology Adoption: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Melissa D Hladek, Olivia C Rubio, Samantha Curriero, Samantha Horn, Avrey Hughes, Deborah H Wilson, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Deidra C Crews, Sarah L Szanton

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melissa D HladekSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Ste. N406, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1-(410) 614-2418.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-2474
Olivia C RubioRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7222-4773
Samantha CurrieroSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Ste. N406, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1-(410) 614-2418.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-7599
Samantha HornSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Ste. N406, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1-(410) 614-2418.ORCID 0009-0009-2317-6870
Avrey HughesSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Ste. N406, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1-(410) 614-2418.ORCID 0009-0004-5724-9066
Deborah H WilsonSchool of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-1330
Mara McAdams-DeMarcoDepartment of Surgery, Langone Health and Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3013-925X
Deidra C CrewsDivision of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-5776
Sarah L SzantonSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Ste. N406, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States, 1-(410) 614-2418.ORCID 0000-0001-5418-4982

Funding

Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
Understanding and addressing risks of low socioeconomic status and diabetes for heart failureP50MD017348 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOWER, KELLY · 2021 to 2025
$24.2M
Addressing Inactive Kidney Transplant Waitlist Status through Adapting a Tailored Psycho-Social-Environmental ProgramK23DK133677 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Melissa Hladek · 2023 to 2026
$779k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK133677NIMHD NIH HHS P50 MD017348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although technology usage is steadily increasing among older adults, adoption and confidence greatly lag behind their younger counterparts. Sociocultural and health disparities intersect with aging to present distinct structural and psychosocial barriers to the adoption of newer technologies. Digital health literacy interventions can improve task-specific skills, technological self-efficacy, and use frequency, but most do not systematically incorporate older adults' values and goals, which are key drivers of sustained behavior change. Objective: The proposed study aims to develop and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a person-directed, values-based, in-home digital literacy intervention for older adults, entitled values-informed solutions for technology adoption (VISTA). Methods: VISTA begins with a values and goals discussion rather than a skills test, mapping "What Matters Most" to individualized, SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) technology goals. Over 8 to 12 weeks, interventionists co-developed personalized learning plans with participants, delivering up to 6 in-home biweekly visits and interim phone calls. The study provided a tablet and assistance with obtaining home internet when needed. Outcomes included digital literacy (Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire), technology and chronic disease self-efficacy, social networks, multimorbidity, and frailty (Fried Frailty Phenotype). Feasibility was assessed via recruitment, retention or completion, data collection rates, survey administration time, withdrawal, intervention fidelity, and per-person cost; acceptability was assessed via a postintervention satisfaction survey (Likert and open-ended items) and willingness to recommend. Results: Funding was secured in November 2023. Institutional review board approval, intervention development, and focus groups were completed throughout 2024. Recruitment and baseline assessments occurred from January 2025 to July 2025, enrolling 21 participants and randomizing 11 to immediate intervention and 10 to waitlist control (waitlist participants received the intervention after a 3-month control period). One consented participant was unable to participate early in the intervention and is not included in analyses. Inclusion criteria included being aged 65 years and older, having English proficiency, and demonstrating a willingness to improve digital literacy. Exclusion criteria involved severe cognitive impairment. At baseline, participants had a mean age of 75.7 (SD 7.74) years and were predominantly female (n=13, 65%) and Black (n=19, 95%); most reported having a low income (10/12, 83%), living alone (12/14, 85.7%), and multimorbidity (mean disease count 3.95, SD 2.46). Follow-up assessments concluded in March 2026; data cleaning and analysis are ongoing, with primary feasibility and acceptability findings anticipated for fall 2026. Conclusions: This protocol offers a unique model centering on the values and goals of older adults to improve access, use, and understanding of technology. Tapping into the motivators of older adults may provide a more beneficial way to encourage older adult technology use. VISTA could be useful in many general contexts, more specifically for older adults who are homebound or have serious illnesses, or as a preintervention for interventions involving advanced technology understanding.

Indexed as

Digital HealthEmpowermentHealth LiteracyAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf Efficacydigital literacyfrailtyin-homeperson-centered careself-efficacytechnology

Identifiers

PMID42166781
PMCPMC13193668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.