ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Aid, debt, International Monetary Fund conditionalities and domestic health financing in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), public external debt burdens as well as the number of International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan conditionalities have grown over time. These externally derived macro-fiscal factors, along with official development assistance (ODA), may influence the fiscal space for health and policy decisions that co-determine to what extent countries finance their health systems with domestic government funds (GHE-S), and to what extent they rely on household out-of-pocket payments (OOP). The levels and balance of these sources have great implications for health service access and health outcomes, particularly among poorer population groups. However, we did not identify studies that have jointly examined how these key external factors are associated with GHE-S and OOP, nor compared their correlation sizes. This is key for understanding which might be the most effective policy levers for pursuing universal health coverage (UHC). We performed a panel data study of 105 LMICs from 2005 to 2019, investigating associations between GHE-S and OOP, and a set of ODA-, public external debt- and IMF programme, and conditionality variables. We used the generalized method of moments estimator and performed a range of robustness checks. Increases in ODA via the recipient country public sector were associated with modest reductions in both OOP and GHE-S, measured per GDP. Increases in public external debt servicing per GDP were associated with slight relative increases in OOP and slight relative decreases in GHE-S per CHE. We found no relationship between IMF programme participation or conditionalities and GHE-S or OOP. Our findings support less donor concern of aid fungibility in the health sector, while adding that both on- and off-budget ODA for health also appear to modestly subsidize OOP. Our findings for debt indicated a small shift in the burden of payment from the government onto the user from increasing public external debt servicing. This provides some added support to calls for debt resolution among more heavily indebted LMICs to avoid the negative health service access implications from OOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.