ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning reveals microbiome differences by periodontitis severity.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease driven by microbial dysbiosis, yet the microbial signatures associated with severity remain incompletely understood. This study investigated changes in subgingival microbial composition across clinically defined severity groups and evaluated the performance of microbiome-based machine-learning models for classifying periodontitis severity. Subgingival plaque samples from 84 patients were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Microbial diversity showed a modest decreasing trend with increasing severity, although differences were not statistically significant. Five machine learning models were applied to classify periodontitis. Random Forest and XGBoost achieved AUC values of 0.98, indicating statistically significant classification performance (p < 0.05) after feature selection. Validation using three external cohorts demonstrated substantial performance variability across populations, reflecting differences in oral microbiome composition, sample type, and periodontal status definitions. Feature importance analysis identified Fusobacterium, Campylobacter, Stomatobaculum, Leptotrichia and Segatella as key contributors to periodontitis severity classification, consistent with their established roles in periodontal dysbiosis. These findings highlight the potential of microbiome-based models for classifying periodontitis severity while underscoring the need to incorporate diverse populations and robust feature-selection strategies to enhance generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.