ArticlePloS one2026
Medication error reporting in Ghana: A multicenter assessment of healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication errors (MEs) remain a leading cause of preventable patient harm globally, with significant implications in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where reporting systems are not standardized. Understanding healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices is critical to designing interventions that strengthen patient safety.
methodsA cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted among healthcare professionals, including nurses, doctors, and pharmacists. A structured questionnaire assessed sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of categories and sources of MEs, medication administration practices, and awareness and use of error reporting systems. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Poisson regression with robust standard errors to identify factors associated with reporting system awareness.
resultsA total of 2078 healthcare professionals including nurses, doctors, and pharmacists were surveyed. Knowledge levels varied across different medication error categories, with highest recognition for wrong dose (85.5%) and wrong patient errors (81.5%), while shortage of drugs showed lower recognition (44.0%). While adherence to some safety practices was strong (86.6% always checked patient identity), unsafe behaviors such as preparing medications for more than one patient at a time (37.4%) and failure to double-check insulin doses (only 33.9% compliance) were reported. Although 62.6% were aware of institutional error reporting systems, only 23.6% consistently reported errors, and over 53% were uncertain about the process of submitting incident forms.
conclusionHealthcare professionals in Ghana demonstrate strong knowledge of medication error categories and sources but notable gaps persist in safe medication practices and reporting behaviors. Despite moderate awareness of reporting systems, utilization remains poor, reflecting systemic and cultural barriers. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions and system improvements to enhance medication safety culture and error reporting practices across different healthcare specialties and experience levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.