ArticlePloS one2026
Assessing attention towards plants: Development and first steps to the validation of the Hidden Object Picture Instrument (HOPI).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public awareness of plants remains limited despite their essential ecological and societal roles. A major challenge in addressing this issue is the absence of validated instruments that measure attentional-memory processes regarding plants. This study introduces the Hidden Object Picture Instrument (HOPI), a novel visual tool designed to assess plant-directed attention in complex natural scenes. The development involved three sub-studies: (1) designing and validating a landscape image based on biodiversity data, (2) examining attentional mechanisms using eye-tracking, recall, and species identification, and (3) testing known-groups validity among students and botanical experts. Free listing combined with salience analysis revealed cognitive prominence and recall patterns for different object types. Eye-tracking showed no correlations between object size, time to first fixation, total fixation duration, average fixation time, and number of fixations and recall salience for plants and animals. Experts exhibited higher plant salience and more specific naming, while students mainly used general terms (e.g., "tree," "field"). These findings indicate that plants are often perceived as background elements rather than distinct entities. The HOPI provides a transparent, replicable method for assessing visual attention to plants and offers valuable applications for research and education. It represents a first step towards understanding and fostering plant awareness as part of environmental education and biodiversity conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.