Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166472›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Prediction of cognitive impairment through speech data analysis: A comparative evaluation of deep learning models.

Minsoo Kim, Hyunjoo Choi, YongSoo Shim, Nayoung Ryoo, Ho Tae Jeong, Gihyun Yun, Hunboc Lee, SangYun Kim, Young Chul Youn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minsoo KimResearch and Development, Baikal AI Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunjoo ChoiDepartment of Communication Disorders, Korea Nazarene University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
YongSoo ShimDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nayoung RyooDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho Tae JeongDepartment of Neurology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gihyun YunResearch and Development, Baikal AI Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hunboc LeeResearch and Development, Baikal AI Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
SangYun KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-5704
Young Chul YounDepartment of Neurology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early detection of cognitive impairments, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), is essential for timely intervention and management. This study evaluates the performance of various deep-learning models in classifying speech recordings from individuals with normal cognition (NC), MCI, and AD, to identify the most effective approach for audio-based cognitive impairment diagnosis.

methodsSpeech data were obtained from the AI Hub "Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Voice/Conversation" dataset. The study analyzed voice recordings from 320 female participants (105 with Alzheimer's disease, 92 with mild cognitive impairment, and 123 cognitively normal controls). Three deep-learning architectures were compared: a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN), an audio spectrogram transformer (AST), and a speech recognition model (Wav2Vec 2.0). The models were trained using features such as spectrograms, mel-spectrograms, and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score, with a five-fold cross-validation strategy to ensure robust and unbiased evaluation. Statistical significance was assessed using pairwise proportion z-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction, and Wilson score 95% confidence intervals were computed for each model's accuracy.

resultsWav2Vec 2.0 outperformed the other models, achieving the highest accuracy and F1-scores for NC vs. MCI (accuracy: 0.74, F1: 0.72) and NC vs. AD (accuracy: 0.83, F1: 0.83). Pairwise proportion z-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction confirmed that Wav2Vec 2.0 significantly outperformed 7 of 10 competing models (corrected p < 0.05) in both classification tasks. Performance varied by model and classification task, with Wav2Vec 2.0 consistently demonstrating superior accuracy across labels.

conclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate models and features for task-specific optimization and provides a foundation for developing non-invasive, speech-based diagnostic tools for cognitive disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDeep LearningSpeechAgedAged, 80 and overConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID42166472
PMCPMC13193450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.