ArticlePloS one2026
Prediction of cognitive impairment through speech data analysis: A comparative evaluation of deep learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe early detection of cognitive impairments, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), is essential for timely intervention and management. This study evaluates the performance of various deep-learning models in classifying speech recordings from individuals with normal cognition (NC), MCI, and AD, to identify the most effective approach for audio-based cognitive impairment diagnosis.
methodsSpeech data were obtained from the AI Hub "Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Voice/Conversation" dataset. The study analyzed voice recordings from 320 female participants (105 with Alzheimer's disease, 92 with mild cognitive impairment, and 123 cognitively normal controls). Three deep-learning architectures were compared: a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN), an audio spectrogram transformer (AST), and a speech recognition model (Wav2Vec 2.0). The models were trained using features such as spectrograms, mel-spectrograms, and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score, with a five-fold cross-validation strategy to ensure robust and unbiased evaluation. Statistical significance was assessed using pairwise proportion z-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction, and Wilson score 95% confidence intervals were computed for each model's accuracy.
resultsWav2Vec 2.0 outperformed the other models, achieving the highest accuracy and F1-scores for NC vs. MCI (accuracy: 0.74, F1: 0.72) and NC vs. AD (accuracy: 0.83, F1: 0.83). Pairwise proportion z-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction confirmed that Wav2Vec 2.0 significantly outperformed 7 of 10 competing models (corrected p < 0.05) in both classification tasks. Performance varied by model and classification task, with Wav2Vec 2.0 consistently demonstrating superior accuracy across labels.
conclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate models and features for task-specific optimization and provides a foundation for developing non-invasive, speech-based diagnostic tools for cognitive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.