ArticlePloS one2026
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) adoption, surgical barriers, and graft customization preference among corneal surgeons: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess surgeon preferences, challenges, and graft-size customization practices in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and to explore their association with surgical confidence and adoption. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional, 22-item online survey was distributed to corneal surgeons to evaluate surgical experience, preferences, graft-size customization practices, and challenges related to DMEK adoption. A total of 55 complete responses were analyzed. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Multiple-response items were analyzed independently. Selected variables were grouped into clinically meaningful categories. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed based on DMEK case volume, and associations were assessed using Fisher's exact test.
resultsA total of 55 participants completed the survey, of whom 47 (85.45%) had performed DMEK. Most participants were male (44, 80.0%) and aged 30-39 years (24, 43.63%). Customized graft sizing was used by 35 (74.47%) participants, and 36 (76.60%) reported that it influenced surgical decision-making or outcomes. Graft unfolding and preparation were the most challenging steps, with 27 (57.45%) and 24 (51.06%) participants reporting moderate to high difficulty, whereas patient selection was generally less difficult (28, 59.57% reporting no difficulty). Higher competence was reported for Descemetorhexis (29, 61.70%) and tissue selection (27, 57.45%), while lower competence was observed for graft unfolding (15, 31.91%). Hands-on and supervised learning methods were most valued, including wet-lab training (32, 68.09%) and one-on-one operating room training (34, 72.34%). Increasing experience was associated with improved performance but was not statistically significant.
conclusionDMEK adoption is influenced by both technical complexity and training exposure. While surgeons demonstrate confidence in foundational steps, graft preparation and unfolding remain key challenges. Structured hands-on training and supervised experience appear critical to improving surgical confidence and may support broader adoption of DMEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.