Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166437›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Learning semantic similarity from sentence pairs using hybrid features centric approach and explainable siamese neural networks.

Weihong Zhao, Chunlu Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weihong ZhaoDepartment of Foreign Language and Architecture Engineering, Qingdao Huanghai University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3980-2276
Chunlu HuDepartment of Foreign Language and Architecture Engineering, Qingdao Huanghai University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic embeddings play an important role in modern natural language processing because they help models understand meaning beyond individual words. Accurate text similarity is essential for many applications such as search, automated scoring, summarization, and question answering. However, existing methods based on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) or simple lexical overlap often fail when sentences differ in length, structure, or word choice. These methods are less in performance, especially when working with short or medium-length sentences where meaning is expressed in different ways. This study explores sentence-level similarity using a Siamese BiLSTM model that learns deep semantic patterns and relationships between two sentences. The model captures contextual meaning, word interactions, and paraphrastic variations more effectively than traditional approaches. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves the highest performance among machine-learning regressors, with lower errors and improved stability. Compared to TF-IDF, cosine similarity, and feature-based regressors, the Siamese model provides more accurate judgments of semantic closeness with RMSE of 0.16 and MAE of 0.107. Feature-level analysis using TF-IDF, Jaccard similarity, and embedding distances further supports these findings. Explainable AI techniques (SHAP, LIME) confirm model transparency by highlighting meaningful semantic cues and distributing attention across important linguistic features.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42166437
PMCPMC13193534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.