ArticlePublic health genomics2026
Sex-Based Disparities in Fabry Disease Cause Challenges in Newborn Screening.
Article in Public health genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFabry disease (FD) is a multi-systemic, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by decreased α-galactosidase activity. Early diagnosis enables timely treatment, but enzyme-based newborn screening (NBS) may not detect affected females. We hypothesized that enzyme-based NBS limitations contribute to sex-based diagnostic disparities in FD and investigated these differences.
methodsRetrospective cohort analyses used data from the Fabry Registry (FR: 2001-2023) and Tennessee NBS (2017-2024). Sex differences in diagnosis via NBS, biochemical phenotype, symptom onset, and treatment initiation were analyzed using Wilcoxon and chi-square tests.
resultsAmong 8,657 FR individuals, 73 (67 males, 6 females) were identified via NBS. FR data show that affected females had significantly higher residual α-galactosidase activity than affected males (leukocyte median: 45.9% vs. 3.9%, plasma median: 32.5% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.0001 for both). FR females had delayed symptom onset (18.1 vs. 11.1 years), later diagnosis (35.5 vs. 30.8 years), and lower treatment rates (51.1% vs. 80.8%) compared to males (all %, p < 0.0001). Tennessee NBS detected 25 males but no females.
conclusionFemales with FD have delays in symptom onset, diagnosis, and treatment compared to males. Furthermore, higher residual enzyme activity causes current enzyme-based NBS to miss most females. Incorporating sex-specific cutoffs and/or molecular sequencing into NBS could improve early detection and reduce sex-based disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.