Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166241›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Cultural evolution of beauty standards.

Louis Boucherie, Sagar Kumar, Katharina Ledebur, August Lohse, Karolina Śliwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louis BoucherieDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-1565
Sagar KumarNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.
Katharina LedeburComplexity Science Hub, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9923-1172
August LohseCenter for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3671-3024
Karolina ŚliwaDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, Vienna University of Economics and Business, 1020 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0006-3271-0199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beauty standards shape self-perception and health through social comparison and objectification, while exposure to idealized imagery exacerbates body-image concerns. Media and fashion are central arbiters of these ideals, yet long-term, quantitative, intersectional studies on how representation has changed remain scarce. We assembled a dataset of 793,199 records spanning 25 y of advertising, magazine covers, runway shows, and editorials to quantify changes in anthropometric and demographic representation. We find a paradox in the evolution of beauty ideals: While representational diversity has increased, the median model physique remains stable. This is driven by selective plus-size inclusion at the upper tail, while the typical physique continues to diverge from the US population. Intersectionally, non-White models are [Formula: see text] times more likely to be plus-size, suggesting that the industry consolidates multiple markers of diversity onto already underrepresented individuals rather than broadening inclusion structurally. Stratifying the industry via a data-driven prestige hierarchy, we find that thinness is overrepresented at the top tier. Finally, descriptive comparisons of two regulatory interventions suggest that numeric thresholds may be more effective than flexible guidelines at reducing underweight appearances. Our results quantify the cultural evolution in media and fashion, revealing that inclusion has increased; however, gains are uneven and intersectionally concentrated on size and ethnicity, whereas the prevailing thin ideal remains largely unchanged.

Indexed as

BeautyBody ImageCultural EvolutionHumanscultural evolutionintersectionalitypublic healthquantitative social science

Identifiers

PMID42166241
PMCPMC13214048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.