Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166103›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2026

Refining Insect Pest Monitoring: How Crop and Pest Identity Influence the Choice of Sampling Unit and Technique.

Adriano Cirino Tomaz, Francisco Sérgio Neres da Silva, Gerson Adriano Silva, Katiuchia Pereira Takeuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriano Cirino TomazFaculdade de Agronomia E Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil. adrianotomaz86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-7696
Francisco Sérgio Neres da SilvaFaculdade de Agronomia e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9503-5609
Gerson Adriano SilvaUniversidade Estadual Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-9758
Katiuchia Pereira TakeuchiFaculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-8279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the most suitable sampling unit (apical, middle, or basal leaf strata) and sampling technique (direct counting or tray beating) for sap-sucking pest groups (aphids, thrips, lace bugs, and whiteflies) across different crops in an agroforestry system (AFS). The study was conducted with kale, okra, tomato, and scarlet eggplant over three cropping seasons (one in 2023 and two in 2024). The main pest species were Lipaphis erysimi on kale and Aphis gossypii on okra (aphids); Corythaica passiflorae on scarlet eggplant and Gargaphia lunulata on okra (lace bugs); Bemisia tabaci on kale and tomato (whiteflies); and Frankliniella schultzei on tomato and Thrips spp. on okra (thrips). A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution was used to evaluate the effects of sampling technique, sampling unit, and crop on pest density. Optimal sampling combinations were defined based on higher mean densities and lower coefficients of variation (CV). Direct counting was the most effective technique for aphids, whiteflies, and lace bugs, whereas tray beating was more efficient for thrips. However, the optimal sampling unit varied strongly according to crop-pest interactions. These results indicate that, although sampling techniques can be partially standardized by pest group, the selection of the sampling unit must consider crop-specific interactions. This approach improves sampling efficiency and supports decision-making in Integrated Pest Management programs in diversified agroecosystems such as AFS.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalInsectaInsect ControlAnimalsHemipteraSolanum lycopersicumThysanopteraAphidDirect countingInsect samplingIntegrated pest managementTray beatingWhitefly

Identifiers

PMID42166103
PMCPMC13194225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.