Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166089›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Management of Gastrointestinal Schwannomas: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Daniel Paramythiotis, Dimitrios Tsavdaris, Konstantina Katsiafliaka, Niki Vasiliki Tsakiri, Panagiotis Tsintidis, Maria Angeliki Kreza, Elizabeth Psoma, Alexandros Mekras, Antonios Michalopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel ParamythiotisFirst Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. danosprx@auth.gr.
Dimitrios TsavdarisFirst Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantina KatsiafliakaFirst Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Niki Vasiliki TsakiriSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Panagiotis TsintidisSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria Angeliki KrezaSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Elizabeth PsomaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Alexandros MekrasFirst Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Antonios MichalopoulosFirst Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastrointestinal schwannomas are rare mesenchymal tumors that arise from the Schwann cells of the enteric nervous system, representing a unique clinicopathological entity among subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this state-of-the-art review is therefore to analyze the specific clinicopathological characteristics of these rare tumors as well as to better understand the appropriate diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches where these are required.

methodsThis review combines findings from large series studies to provide a complete analysis of gastrointestinal schwannomas, even those with unusual locations.

resultsDespite the typical occurrence of these tumors within the stomach, they can occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract, from the esophagus, small intestine, colon, rectum, through to the mesentery, presenting a diagnostic dilemma. Due to the non-specific presentation, radiological, and endoscopic similarities between schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), a preoperative misdiagnosis is common. Recent improvements in immunohistochemistry have helped to define their biological identity based on widespread staining for S100/SOX10 with absence of KIT/DOG1 mutations. While techniques such as contrast-enhanced CT scans as well as endoscopic ultrasonography have certain diagnostic advantages, they are not sufficient to make a diagnosis without histopathological validation. Surgical resection is considered the mainstay of therapy, addressing both purposes. Endoscopic methods have been adopted for smaller lesions in more favorable locations, while surgical resection is considered standard for larger or more complex lesions.

conclusionDespite their rarity, early and accurate diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary interventions when conservative management may be appropriate. When treatment is required, resection strategies should be tailored to tumor characteristics.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeurilemmomaDiagnosis, DifferentialGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansDifferential diagnosisEndoscopic resectionGastrointestinal schwannomaMesenchymal tumorsMinimally invasive surgeryRadiomicsS100SOX10Subepithelial lesions

Identifiers

PMID42166089
PMCPMC13194306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.