ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2026
Addressing the silent epidemic: a narrative review and evidence synthesis of digital health and telehealth interventions for loneliness in older adults.
Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness and social isolation represent major threats to the health and well-being of older adults, conferring elevated risks for depression, cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality. The rapid proliferation of digital health technologies and telehealth services-accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic-has opened new pathways for addressing these challenges at scale.
objectiveThis narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the effectiveness of digital health and telehealth interventions in reducing loneliness and social isolation among older adults, examines the diverse modalities employed, identifies barriers to equitable adoption, and proposes directions for future research.
methodsA narrative synthesis was conducted drawing on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies identified through PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, primarily spanning 2020-2025. Interventions examined include telehealth video visits, empathy-focused telephone programs, group videoconferencing, digital mental health platforms, mobile health applications, social robots, and AI-enabled companions.
resultsTelehealth video visits, empathy-focused telephone programs, and group-based videoconferencing demonstrate meaningful reductions in loneliness, depression, and anxiety in several RCTs and pilot studies. Digital mental health platforms incorporating cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness show promise, as do AI-enabled social robots in institutional and community settings. However, meta-analytic evidence reveals considerable heterogeneity: some pooled analyses report modest to null overall effects, while others find medium effect sizes (d = - 0.47). Intervention effectiveness appears contingent on design features, population characteristics, training support, and integration with existing social networks. The digital divide-limited digital literacy, technology access, usability challenges, and preference for in-person care-remains a challenging barrier to equitable implementation.
conclusionsDigital health and telehealth interventions hold considerable promise for mitigating loneliness among older adults. However, their benefits cannot be realized without systematically addressing the digital divide. Large-scale, well-powered RCTs with standardized outcome measures and longer follow-up periods are urgently needed, alongside implementation science research to translate evidence into scalable practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.