Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166056›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2026

Host Filtering Shapes the Soil-gut Microbiome Linkages in Pastoral Systems.

Upulika Jayaneththi, Nicholas W Sneddon, Lucy L Burkitt, Paramsothy Jeyakumar, Christopher W N Anderson, Lisanne M Fermin, Daniel J Donaghy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Upulika JayaneththiSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. H.Jayaneththi@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-6757
Nicholas W SneddonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. N.W.Sneddon@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-1287
Lucy L BurkittSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-5764
Paramsothy JeyakumarSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9841-8645
Christopher W N AndersonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0935-1475
Lisanne M FerminSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-8807
Daniel J DonaghySchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-5773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil and ruminant gut microbiomes are linked within grazing pastoral systems, yet the strength and direction of these connections under different pasture management systems remain poorly understood. This study characterised bacterial communities in soil and faeces from cattle and sheep grazing standard and diverse pastures managed under contemporary and regenerative practices using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Shared bacterial taxa between soil and gut were identified, and their dominance patterns and soil-gut diversity relationships were evaluated using Spearman correlations and Procrustes analyses. Several taxa, including Prevotella copri, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides uniformis, Clostridium perfringens and Fibrobacter succinogenes were commonly shared between soil and gut but were usually more prevalent in the gut, indicating predominant host‑associated dominance. Soil exhibited significantly greater bacterial alpha diversity than the gut across all treatments, and neither pasture diversity nor management significantly affected soil-gut alpha diversity differences or the contributions of shared taxa. Correlations between soil and gut alpha diversity were weak and non-significant, and correlations for beta diversity between soil and gut varied through time and among treatments without reaching significance. These findings indicate that, although soil-gut microbial connectivity exists, gut communities are primarily shaped by host-related ecological processes and internal filtering, with soil acting mainly as a diverse reservoir and sink for gut-derived taxa. This highlights that host-driven gut microbiomes primarily shape the soil-gut microbiome link, limiting the strong direct influence of pasture diversity or management.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsBiodiversityCattleFecesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRuminant gut microbiomeShared bacterial taxaSoil-gut interactionsSoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID42166056
PMCPMC13369704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.