ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Uncertainty-guided model learning for trustworthy medical image segmentation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although recent AI algorithms have greatly improved accuracy, there is still skepticism among clinicians about the reliability and trustworthiness of these algorithms when used in real-life situations. To address this, our research proposes a new method for trustworthy medical image segmentation, which aims to produce reliable segmentation results and reliable uncertainty estimations without imposing an excessive computational burden. One key feature of our approach is the extraction of feature maps from each decoder and their fusion based on voxel-level uncertainty to leverage multi-scale semantic information fully. We also model the probability and uncertainty of medical image segmentation problems using subjective logic theory, which quantifies the uncertainty of the backbone by modeling class probabilities as a Dirichlet distribution and calculating the distribution strength. Moreover, our framework learns to gather reliable evidence from features, leading to the final segmentation results. To further improve model performance, an uncertainty-based adaptive threshold strategy is designed based on voxel-level uncertainty. This strategy dynamically adjusts the threshold based on the model's learning state, guiding the model to focus on regions with high uncertainty to optimize segmentation results. Extensive experiments on multiple public datasets have validated the effectiveness of our approach, the code is released at https://github.com/SCUT-Ye/UGML .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42166053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.