Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166053›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

Uncertainty-guided model learning for trustworthy medical image segmentation.

Qi Ye, Lihua Guo, Qi Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi YeSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Lihua GuoSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China. guolihua@scut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-3930
Qi WuSchool of Computer Science and Information Technology, The University of Adelaide, ADELAIDE, SA 5005, Australia.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515011549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recent AI algorithms have greatly improved accuracy, there is still skepticism among clinicians about the reliability and trustworthiness of these algorithms when used in real-life situations. To address this, our research proposes a new method for trustworthy medical image segmentation, which aims to produce reliable segmentation results and reliable uncertainty estimations without imposing an excessive computational burden. One key feature of our approach is the extraction of feature maps from each decoder and their fusion based on voxel-level uncertainty to leverage multi-scale semantic information fully. We also model the probability and uncertainty of medical image segmentation problems using subjective logic theory, which quantifies the uncertainty of the backbone by modeling class probabilities as a Dirichlet distribution and calculating the distribution strength. Moreover, our framework learns to gather reliable evidence from features, leading to the final segmentation results. To further improve model performance, an uncertainty-based adaptive threshold strategy is designed based on voxel-level uncertainty. This strategy dynamically adjusts the threshold based on the model's learning state, guiding the model to focus on regions with high uncertainty to optimize segmentation results. Extensive experiments on multiple public datasets have validated the effectiveness of our approach, the code is released at https://github.com/SCUT-Ye/UGML .

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansUncertaintyDirichlet distributionMedical image segmentationUncertainty estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.