ArticlePsychological research2026
The role of social status on the reading and comprehension of euphemisms: an eye-tracking study role of social status on the reading and comprehension of euphemisms.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores how social status influences the processing and comprehension of euphemisms in language. Using an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated the social status of the speaker and recipient, examining participants' reading behavior as they encountered euphemisms or literal language in dialogues. All participants recruited for this study were university students.Results showed that when low-status speakers used euphemisms, readers exhibited increased cognitive effort, as evidenced by longer fixation durations, higher fixation counts, and extended regression path durations. In contrast, high-status speakers did not induce significant differences in reading patterns between euphemistic and literal expressions. These findings suggest that social status plays a crucial role in shaping expectations about language use, with low-status speakers expected to use more direct language. Furthermore, we employed decoding analyses using a fully connected neural network to confirm that eye movement patterns could distinguish between high- and low-status contexts, underscoring the broader cognitive implications of social context on language comprehension. This research contributes to understanding the intersection of social cognition and pragmatics, highlighting the influence of social hierarchies in non-literal language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42166036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.