ArticleOdontology2026
Multi-class anatomical landmark detection in periapical radiographs with deep learning.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a deep learning model for the detection and segmentation of multiple anatomical landmarks on periapical radiographs from the maxilla and mandible. A total of 1930 paralleling-technique periapical radiographs with 21 annotated anatomical landmarks were divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%) sets. Geometry-preserving preprocessing was applied before dataset splitting, while appearance-based augmentation was performed exclusively on the training subset after the split. A YOLOv8x-seg architecture was trained for multi-class detection and instance segmentation. Performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, Dice coefficient, Intersection-over-Union, mean average precision, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. The model demonstrated stable training and consistent performance. Overall precision, recall, and F1-score were 0.820, 0.725, and 0.769, respectively, with an overall Dice coefficient of 0.621. High detection accuracy was achieved for well-defined structures such as the maxillary sinus, nasal fossa, nasal fossa floor, and nasal septum, whereas low-contrast landmarks showed reduced performance. Confidence-dependent analysis indicated optimal performance at low confidence thresholds (approximately 0.05-0.10). In conclusion, the proposed model effectively detected major anatomical landmarks on periapical radiographs while demonstrating expected limitations for small or low-contrast structures. Despite substantial anatomical variability across maxillary and mandibular regions, anterior-posterior sites, and projection-dependent appearances of similar structures, these findings demonstrate that deep learning can reliably identify key anatomical landmarks, supporting safer, more consistent, and clinically meaningful radiographic interpretation in routine dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42166021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.