Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42166016›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Multiparametric MRI for non-mass enhancement breast lesions: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Basma K Soliman, Rania Refaat, Hamada M Khater, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Rasha Taha Abouelkheir, Reem Abdel Fattah Frere, Nader E M Mahmoud, Pasant M Abo-Elhoda, Amro Ahmed Esmat Abdul Rahman, Mohamed M A Zaitoun and 24 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Basma K SolimanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Rania RefaatDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Intervention and Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Human Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamada M KhaterDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik BashaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. Mohammad_basha76@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-8020
Rasha Taha AbouelkheirDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Reem Abdel Fattah FrereDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Nader E M MahmoudDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Pasant M Abo-ElhodaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Intervention and Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Human Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amro Ahmed Esmat Abdul RahmanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamed M A ZaitounDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ghada Adel AbdelHamidDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamad Gamal NadaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Rabab Mahmoud ElfwakhryDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmed M Alaa EldinDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmad Abdullah AlnaggarDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Khaled Mohamed AltaherDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Hossam A El KenawyDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mona Mohammed RefaatDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mona Mahmoud EladlDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Bassant Mahmoud DawoudDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Waleed S Abo ShanabDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.
Carmen Ali ZaradDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohamed AbouelhodaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Intervention and Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Human Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Enas Moustafa IbrahimDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Walid MosallamDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Ahmed Ali ObayaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Taha A BiomyDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Karim Mohamed FathyDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Tamer Mahmoud DawoudDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ahmed M Abdelkhalik BashaFaculty of General Medicine, St. Petersburg State University, Cairo Branch, Cairo, Egypt.
Amal ElshabrawyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Reem M Abdelkhalik MohammadCollege of Medicine, Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport, El Alamein, Egypt.
Ahmed Fekry SalemDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Hadeer Khalid SafwatDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric breast MRI combining dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating benign from malignant non-mass enhancement (NME) breast lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study recruited patients from seven tertiary centers with centralized imaging over a 20-month period. The index test was multiparametric MRI, including morphological assessment, kinetic curve analysis, and DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. The reference standard was histopathological confirmation. Nine experienced radiologists from participating centers independently evaluated examinations while blinded to clinical history and outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: female patients aged ≥ 18 years with BI-RADS 3-5 NME lesions. Statistical analyses included ROC curve analysis, logistic regression, and inter-reader agreement (IRA) assessment.

resultsA total of 351 female patients (mean age, 44.2 ± 11.1 years; 189 malignant, 162 benign lesions) were enrolled. Consensus-based multiparametric MRI achieved 98.4% (95% CI: 95.6-99.7) sensitivity, 86.4% (95% CI: 80.2-91.3) specificity, 89.4% (95% CI: 84.5-92.9) positive predictive value, 97.9% (95% CI: 94.0-99.6) negative predictive value (NPV), and 92.9% (95% CI: 89.6-95.3) accuracy (AUC = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Individual reader performance averaged 97.1% sensitivity and 84.8% specificity. Five independent predictors were identified: Type III washout curves (OR = 26.84; p = 0.001), segmental distribution (OR = 9.12; p = 0.001), Type II plateau curves (OR = 6.58; p = 0.008), ADC values ≤ 1.3 × 10⁻³ mm²/s (OR = 6.24; p = 0.001), and regional distribution (OR = 5.34; p = 0.032). IRA was almost perfect (κ = 0.847; 95% CI: 0.801-0.893). High NPV was maintained across all BI-RADS categories (96.8-98.5%).

conclusionMultiparametric breast MRI demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy for NME lesions with high NPV, supporting potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies while maintaining excellent sensitivity. KEY POINTS: Question Can multiparametric MRI combining dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy for non-mass enhancement breast lesions compared to individual imaging parameters? Findings Multiparametric MRI achieved 92.9% accuracy, 98.4% sensitivity, and 86.4% specificity with five independent malignancy predictors, significantly outperforming individual parameters, with almost perfect inter-reader agreement. Clinical relevance Multiparametric breast MRI demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for non-mass enhancement lesions, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining excellent sensitivity for malignancy detection.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBreastBreast neoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingPredictive value of tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.