ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Multiparametric MRI for non-mass enhancement breast lesions: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric breast MRI combining dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating benign from malignant non-mass enhancement (NME) breast lesions. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study recruited patients from seven tertiary centers with centralized imaging over a 20-month period. The index test was multiparametric MRI, including morphological assessment, kinetic curve analysis, and DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. The reference standard was histopathological confirmation. Nine experienced radiologists from participating centers independently evaluated examinations while blinded to clinical history and outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: female patients aged ≥ 18 years with BI-RADS 3-5 NME lesions. Statistical analyses included ROC curve analysis, logistic regression, and inter-reader agreement (IRA) assessment.
resultsA total of 351 female patients (mean age, 44.2 ± 11.1 years; 189 malignant, 162 benign lesions) were enrolled. Consensus-based multiparametric MRI achieved 98.4% (95% CI: 95.6-99.7) sensitivity, 86.4% (95% CI: 80.2-91.3) specificity, 89.4% (95% CI: 84.5-92.9) positive predictive value, 97.9% (95% CI: 94.0-99.6) negative predictive value (NPV), and 92.9% (95% CI: 89.6-95.3) accuracy (AUC = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Individual reader performance averaged 97.1% sensitivity and 84.8% specificity. Five independent predictors were identified: Type III washout curves (OR = 26.84; p = 0.001), segmental distribution (OR = 9.12; p = 0.001), Type II plateau curves (OR = 6.58; p = 0.008), ADC values ≤ 1.3 × 10⁻³ mm²/s (OR = 6.24; p = 0.001), and regional distribution (OR = 5.34; p = 0.032). IRA was almost perfect (κ = 0.847; 95% CI: 0.801-0.893). High NPV was maintained across all BI-RADS categories (96.8-98.5%).
conclusionMultiparametric breast MRI demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy for NME lesions with high NPV, supporting potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies while maintaining excellent sensitivity. KEY POINTS: Question Can multiparametric MRI combining dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy for non-mass enhancement breast lesions compared to individual imaging parameters? Findings Multiparametric MRI achieved 92.9% accuracy, 98.4% sensitivity, and 86.4% specificity with five independent malignancy predictors, significantly outperforming individual parameters, with almost perfect inter-reader agreement. Clinical relevance Multiparametric breast MRI demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for non-mass enhancement lesions, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining excellent sensitivity for malignancy detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42166016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.