ReviewFolia microbiologica2026
Nanomaterial-nucleic acid probe synergy: accelerating rapid pathogen detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in bloodstream infections.
Review in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain among the most lethal clinical syndromes, driven in large part by diagnostic delays that compel empiric, broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy and expose patients to avoidable toxicity and resistance selection. Conventional blood culture-based workflows, although diagnostically definitive, are intrinsically slow, often requiring 24-72 h, and are therefore poorly matched to the time-critical demands of sepsis management, where each hour of delayed appropriate therapy measurably increases mortality. In this context, nano-enabled nucleic acid diagnostics represent a promising but largely preclinical strategy for improving analytical sensitivity and turnaround time. This critical translational review examines how engineered nanomaterials spanning plasmonic and magnetic nanoparticles, fluorescent quantum dots, upconversion nanoparticles, and two-dimensional materials synergize with programmable nucleic acid recognizers, including aptamers, CRISPR/Cas effectors, DNAzymes, and conformational probes, to enable rapid, ultrasensitive detection of pathogens and resistance determinants directly from whole blood. Rather than reviewing nanomaterials and nucleic acid probes as separate toolkits, this article focuses on how their co-design at the nano-bio interface enables clinically actionable whole-blood diagnostics. We elucidate how convergence engineering at the nano-bio interface governs signal amplification, background suppression, and assay robustness in complex biological matrices. Particular emphasis is placed on front-end enrichment strategies, optical and magnetic transduction mechanisms, and multiplexed readout architectures that together enable species-level identification and early antimicrobial susceptibility profiling within clinically relevant timeframes, typically ~ 1-6 h in research settings. Beyond analytical performance, we critically assess interconnected translational barriers including batch-to-batch reproducibility, standardization of bioconjugation protocols, antifouling strategies, and evolving regulatory frameworks, which collectively govern the trajectory from laboratory innovation to clinical adoption. At present, direct-from-blood phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing remains technically challenging, and clinical adoption is limited by reproducibility, matrix tolerance, and workflow integration. By integrating mechanistic insight with clinical positioning, this review frames nano-probe diagnostics as promising candidates for next-generation BSI management that may support more timely and precise therapy once analytical robustness, standardization, and clinical validation are achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42165978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.