Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165947›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2026

Imaging in inflammatory bowel disease 2025: ECCO-ESGAR-ESP-IBUS diagnostic and monitoring recommendations with MRI and intestinal ultrasound in treat-to-target strategies.

Igor Vlašiček, Emina Talakić

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Igor VlašičekDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Emina TalakićDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria. emina.talakic@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-138X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2025 ECCO-ESGAR-ESP-IBUS multisociety guidelines mark a paradigm shift in IBD management, positioning imaging as a central element of the treat-to-target strategy. This critical review analyzes these updates from a radiological perspective. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are now established as co-first-line modalities for diagnosis and monitoring, reflecting their proven accuracy and safety. Evidence from trials such as METRIC, TRUST-UC, and PISA-II demonstrates that cross-sectional imaging reliably detects disease activity, complications, and therapeutic response, enabling proactive, non-invasive disease control. The guidelines promote early imaging-based assessment and incorporate transmural healing as an achievable therapeutic target. However, practical barriers remain, including limited access to MRE, operator dependence on IUS, and heterogeneity in the definition of transmural healing and fibrosis. Implementing standardized protocols and structured training is essential to realize the guidelines' vision. By positioning imaging at the core of IBD care, the 2025 guidelines transform radiology from a diagnostic adjunct to a strategic driver of precision therapy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Cross-sectional imaging, particularly MRE and IUS, has become indispensable for comprehensive IBD assessment. The 2025 ECCO-ESGAR-ESP-IBUS guidelines integrate imaging into every phase of patient management, underscoring its value for diagnosis, monitoring, and achieving transmural remission. This shift requires structured training and harmonization across Europe. KEY POINTS: MRE and IUS have become co-first-line modalities for IBD diagnosis and follow-up with imaging now embedded within the treat-to-target framework, emphasizing early response and transmural healing. MRE is preferred for baseline staging and complex complications; IUS excels in dynamic, point-of-care monitoring. Standardization and training remain major barriers to implementation.

Indexed as

GuidelinesIBDMultimodalityReview

Identifiers

PMID42165947
PMCPMC13194817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.