ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
One-step warming procedure improves embryonic development of vitrified mouse oocytes by mitigating mitochondrial damage.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether the one-step warming (OW) procedure affects oocyte survival and developmental potential after fertilization in vitrified oocytes.
methodsStandard vitrified mouse oocytes were warmed using two different procedures: (1) standard multi-step warming (SW) and (2) one-step warming (OW). The survival rates and early embryonic development potentials of the warmed oocytes were compared following insemination by piezo-ICSI. Spindle integrity of the warmed oocytes was evaluated by α-tubulin/Hoechst staining, and mitochondrial status was assessed using Mitotracker/JC-1 staining, with mitochondrial damage analyzed by Confocal microscope. Additionally, the apoptosis status of the resulting blastocysts in each group was compared using a TUNEL assay.
resultsThe OW procedure maintained oocyte survival and fertilization rates comparable to those of the SW procedure, but significantly (P < 0.05) increased blastocyst development after fertilization. Mechanistic measures revealed that the OW procedure improved embryonic developmental potential by mitigating mitochondrial damage compared with the SW procedure.
conclusionsThese findings provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing the OW procedure for already vitrified and stored oocytes in ARTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.