ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Qualitative perspectives of early surgeon users on the value of the daVinci 5 surgical system.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Force sensing and haptic feedback in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis of technological evolution and translational trajectories.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Transoral Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: Communication-Related Outcomes and Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To understand the value and experience of using the da Vinci 5 (dV-5) robotic surgical system among early-adopting surgeons in the United States. In March 2024, da Vinci 5 was released with new features such as a haptic technology (called Force Feedback) and Case Insights, a tool leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver video recordings of cases with objective metrics of performance. Few studies have assessed the value and challenges experienced by surgeons using this new system. Twenty-three semi-structured qualitative interviews were completed with surgeon-participants over video conferencing software representing a selection of surgical specialties, case volumes, and practice types. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and deidentified. Results were analyzed by one reviewer using an inductive-deductive thematic approach and further verified by another reviewer. Themes were mapped to value domains and challenges with adoption. Among the participants, there were a higher proportion of males, surgeons who practiced at community hospitals, and those with medium to high volumes of robotic cases. Thematic analysis revealed two main themes with seven subthemes exploring either the value beliefs or barriers/challenges with adoption to the new system. Participants found the most value in dV-5 with its ergonomic comfort, ability to support future training of surgeons, and an economic benefit in reducing operative time. There were mixed findings around its impact for improving clinical outcomes given the early system maturity. Thematic analysis of interviews with early-adopting surgeons indicated that the dV5 system supports better ergonomics, surgeon training and may have implications for some key surgical metrics such as tissue tearing and operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.