ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
A benchmark of methods for surgical instrument segmentation in endoscopic pituitary surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe development of impactful AI solutions for minimally invasive surgeries is reliant on fundamental tasks such as surgical instrument segmentation. The fine-grained information provided can support downstream tasks such as skill assessment, intra-operative decision support, and outcome prediction. However, many procedures which stand to benefit significantly from these applications are under-represented in literature as a result of the heavy requirements for data collection and annotation.
methodsThis study examines an in-house labelled surgical instrument dataset for endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and compares the performance of a number of established segmentation models, with both transformer-based and convolutional architectures.
resultsOur results show that the highest performance was achieved by the EoMT model, with a DSC of 0.7420 while maintaining a more balanced performance across minority classes. Additionally, our results show the challenges caused by the use of real surgical footage, with highly variable frame contents, and significant class imbalances. This is reflected in the reduced performance across classes with low frequencies which are similar in appearance to more popular classes.
conclusionThese findings highlight model architectures with potential for development and application to surgical instrument segmentation in pituitary surgery and additionally emphasise the need for larger datasets and further work to include under-represented surgeries with novel challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.