ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Predictors of multidisciplinary tumor board implementation in head and neck cancer: Global insights.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify institutional and organizational determinants associated with the adoption of multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) in head and neck cancer management across diverse healthcare settings.
methodsThis cross-sectional analysis used data from 566 responses, corresponding to 457 unique centers across 101 countries participating in the IFOS-YO-IFOS global survey. Centers were categorized by income level, region, and case volume. Logistic regression identified predictors of systematic MDTB use.
resultsAmong responding centers, MDTBs were systematic in 89.1% of North America, 88.9% of European and 87.5% of Oceanian centers, compared with 37.5% in Africa and 32.6% in MENA. High annual case volume (> 200 cases/year) (OR = 3.4, p < 0.001), university affiliation (OR = 2.7, p = 0.002), and access to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 2.1, p = 0.01) independently predicted full MDTB integration. Centers citing economic barriers showed a 65% reduction in odds of MDTB implementation.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that multidisciplinary management in head and neck oncology is strongly influenced by institutional resources and organizational models rather than geography alone. Strengthening MDTB frameworks in low- and middle-income regions could substantially narrow global care inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42165882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.