Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165853›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2026

Training-set conditionally valid prediction sets with right-censored data.

Wenwen Si, Hongxiang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenwen SiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6309, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-248X
Hongxiang QiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-5395, USA. qiuhongx@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification of prediction models through prediction sets is increasingly popular and successful, but most existing methods rely on directly observing the outcome and do not appropriately handle censored outcomes, such as time-to-event outcomes. Candès et al. (2023) and Gui et al. (2024) have introduced distribution-free conformal prediction methods that construct predictive intervals for right-censored outcomes with marginal coverage guarantees. However, these methods typically assume a restrictive Type I censoring framework, in which censoring times are all observed. In this paper, we leverage a semiparametric one-step estimation framework and propose a novel approach for constructing predictive lower bounds on survival times with training-set conditional validity under right-censoring, where censoring times may be unobserved when the survival time is observed. With slight modification, our method can also provide predictive lower bounds with marginal guarantees. Through extensive simulations and a real-world application dataset tracking users' active times on a mobile application, we demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our approach. Compared to existing methods, our technique shows superior efficiency and robustness to model misspecifications, representing a significant advancement in the toolbox for reliable machine learning for time-to-event outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationHumansPrediction AlgorithmsSurvival AnalysisUncertaintyDouble robustnessNonparametric modelPrediction setsSemiparametric efficiencySurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42165853
PMCPMC13194291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.