ArticleLifetime data analysis2026
Training-set conditionally valid prediction sets with right-censored data.
Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification of prediction models through prediction sets is increasingly popular and successful, but most existing methods rely on directly observing the outcome and do not appropriately handle censored outcomes, such as time-to-event outcomes. Candès et al. (2023) and Gui et al. (2024) have introduced distribution-free conformal prediction methods that construct predictive intervals for right-censored outcomes with marginal coverage guarantees. However, these methods typically assume a restrictive Type I censoring framework, in which censoring times are all observed. In this paper, we leverage a semiparametric one-step estimation framework and propose a novel approach for constructing predictive lower bounds on survival times with training-set conditional validity under right-censoring, where censoring times may be unobserved when the survival time is observed. With slight modification, our method can also provide predictive lower bounds with marginal guarantees. Through extensive simulations and a real-world application dataset tracking users' active times on a mobile application, we demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our approach. Compared to existing methods, our technique shows superior efficiency and robustness to model misspecifications, representing a significant advancement in the toolbox for reliable machine learning for time-to-event outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.