ReviewRecent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer2026
Imaging Immunotherapy.
Review in Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy aims to enhance or reactivate immune system function by leveraging both adaptive and innate immunity mechanisms. Key approaches to stimulate tumor-specific immune responses include cytokine therapies, cancer vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade. The field experienced transformative growth after the 2011 approval of ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4), paving the way for subsequent inhibitors of PD-1 and PD-L1 pathways that demonstrated unprecedented survival benefits across multiple malignancies. These breakthroughs have catalyzed advancements in adoptive T cell therapies, particularly genetically modified CAR T cell infusions showing promising clinical efficacy, signaling a paradigm shift in oncology treatment approaches. Meanwhile, response assessment has faced new challenges. In fact, immunotherapy response patterns often contrast with conventional chemotherapy, particularly regarding phenomena like pseudoprogression, delayed clinical effects, and extended disease stabilization. To address these unique dynamics, revised response assessment guidelines have been established to enhance therapeutic development and clinical decision-making. This chapter examines the progression of immune-specific evaluation standards, their application in clinical trials, and their practical consequences, concluding with insights into future advancements in response classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42165836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.