Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165824›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

Sacral morphological variations in the Korean population using PMCT-based 3D reconstruction: a case series.

Hyung-Wook Kwon, Jeonghyun Park, Jaeho Cho, Yu-Jin Choi, Digud Kim, Yunil Choe, Eun-Seo Park, Sohyung Park, Kwang-Rak Park

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hyung-Wook Kwon *Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-2297
Jeonghyun Park *Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2589-2223
Jaeho ChoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Chuncheon, 24253, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-4680
Yu-Jin ChoiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0986
Digud KimDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-4558
Yunil ChoeDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-9662
Eun-Seo ParkDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, 38066, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-1344
Sohyung ParkDivision of Forensic Medical Examination, National Forensic Service, Wonju, 26460, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-7908
Kwang-Rak ParkDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, 38066, Republic of Korea. airboba@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-8622

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00247109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to analyze morphological variations of the sacrum in a Korean population, with particular emphasis on the number and configuration of sacral foramina in relation to lumbar vertebral count. We aimed to describe sacral morphological features that may occur even in the absence of overt transitional anomalies and to highlight potential limitations of conventional definitions based solely on lumbosacral fusion. CASE REPORT: Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) data from three Korean individuals were reconstructed into three-dimensional models using Mimics software. Sacral segmentation patterns, lumbar vertebral counts, and key morphometric parameters were documented for each case. The measured parameters included sacral length (SL), sacral width (SW), superior transverse diameter (STD), and the vertical diameter of the sacral auricular surface (VDSA). DISCUSSION: Each case demonstrated a distinct sacral morphology. Case 1 exhibited five lumbar vertebrae, unilateral non-fusion of the L5 transverse process, and asymmetric sacroiliac articular surfaces (SL 137.5 mm; SW 119.5 mm; STD 52.6 mm; VDSA 66.9 mm right, 58.9 mm left). Case 2 showed four lumbar vertebrae due to bilateral L5-sacral fusion, accompanied by asymmetric fusion patterns and an indistinct S1-S2 boundary (SL 122.4 mm; SW 113.3 mm; STD 53.1 mm; VDSA 59.1 mm right, 60.1 mm left). Case 3 demonstrated five lumbar vertebrae and a six-segmented sacrum (S1-S6) with symmetrical auricular surfaces (SL 128.9 mm; SW 105.6 mm; STD 53.2 mm; VDSA 69.4 mm right, 70.7 mm left).

conclusionThese findings suggest that sacral elongation and remodeling of the auricular surface may occur independently of lumbar vertebral number. This highlights the importance of individualized morphometric assessment in clinical procedures such as sacroiliac joint fusion and caudal epidural anesthesia. Conventional definitions based solely on L5-S1 fusion may not adequately capture the complexity of sacral structure. Consideration of both sacral segmentation patterns and lumbar vertebral counts may enhance anatomical interpretation and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationLumbar VertebraeSacrumAdultCadaverFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPostmortem ImagingRepublic of KoreaTomography, X-Ray ComputedLumbosacral transitional vertebraPostmortem computed tomographySacral segmentationSacral variationThree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.