Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165783›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2026

From Challenges to Solutions: Patient Insights Inform Psychological Intervention Design After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Lisa-Marie Maukel, Thais Coutinho, Sharon Mulvagh, Mina Madan, Christine Pacheco, Karen Bouchard, Derek So, Jennifer Reed, Shuangbo Liu, Louise Sun and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lisa-Marie MaukelUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Thais CoutinhoMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sharon MulvaghDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mina MadanSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine PachecoUniversité de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Karen BouchardUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Derek SoUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer ReedUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shuangbo LiuUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Louise SunUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Amélie PaquinDepartment of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Nadia LappaPatient partner of the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline SawUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Heather TullochUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: hetulloch@ottawaheart.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome, primarily affecting women. SCAD is associated with elevated psychological distress and cardiac rehabilitation programs rarely meet these patients' mental health needs. Although the challenges faced by SCAD survivors are well documented, evidence on how patients want them to be addressed remains limited.

objectivesThis study aimed to examine psychological intervention preferences among SCAD survivors, including potential sex differences.

methodsPatients diagnosed with SCAD within the past 3 years were recruited from 6 Canadian hospitals. Participants completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and rated their interest in intervention content and delivery methods using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated and sex differences were analyzed using t-tests.

resultsAmong 326 participants (92.9% female; mean age 53.3 ± 11.1 years) top-rated intervention components included stress management (3.7 ± 1.2; 64.5% rated very/extremely interested), relaxation techniques (3.5 ± 1.2; 55.4%), cognitive behavioral strategies (3.5 ± 1.3; 56.8%), and processing the SCAD-related trauma (3.4 ± 1.4; 53.5%). Patients preferred SCAD-specific programming (3.9 ± 1.1; 70.8%) delivered by health care professional (3.4 ± 1.3; 56.2%) offered within 1 to 3 months postevent (3.5 ± 1.4; 61.8%). Women expressed greater interest than men in topics such as health advocacy and communication with children (all P < 0.05). Many women (55.1%) also conveyed high interest in gender-specific interventions.

conclusionsSCAD survivors prefer early, individualized, SCAD- and gender-specific interventions focusing on cognitive, emotional, and trauma processing, delivered by health care professionals. Psychological interventions targeting these elements need to be developed and tested for SCAD survivors.

Indexed as

mental healthpsychological intervention needsSCADsex differencesspontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID42165783
PMCPMC13309310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.