Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165726›Full record

Trial reportThe Indian journal of medical research2026

Saroglitazar for non-obese metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): An open-label randomised controlled trial.

Naveen Bhagat, Arka De, Ajay Duseja, Ganesh C P, Mahender Kumar, Manu Mehta, Sunil Taneja, Nancy Sahni, Virendra Singh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naveen BhagatDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arka DeDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ganesh C PDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Mahender KumarDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manu MehtaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nancy SahniDepartment of Dietetics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Virendra SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives Nearly one-third of individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are non-obese, yet evidence for pharmacotherapy in this subgroup remains limited. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of saroglitazar among non-obese individuals with MASLD/NAFLD. Methods In this open-label randomised controlled trial (RCT), non-obese [body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2] adults with NAFLD/MASLD and raised alanine aminotransferase levels (ALT >50 U/L) were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either saroglitazar (4 mg/day) combined with lifestyle modification (Group A) or lifestyle intervention alone (Group B) for a period of six months. The trial was registered with clinical trial registry (CTRI/2022/09/046081). The primary outcome was the change in controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Secondary outcomes included changes in anthropometric measures, insulin resistance, glycaemic indices, lipid profile, ALT, fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score, hepatic steatosis index (HSI), non-invasive fibrosis markers [liver stiffness measurement (LSM), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI),], and adverse events. Results Sixty-six participants (33 per group) completed the study. Both groups showed significant reductions in CAP; however, the median change in CAP did not differ between the two groups [24 dB/m (9-48.8) vs. 14 dB/m (-4.5 to 50); P=0.52]. Alterations in BMI and waist circumference were similar between groups. Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [0.68 (0.14-1.69) vs. -0.51 (-1.12 to 0.44); P=0.03], triglycerides [34 (-1.5 to 76.8) vs. -10 (-28.5 to 20.5) mg/dL; P=0.006], and ALT (43.7±36.7 vs. 28.1±21.5 U/L; P=0.04) were significantly improved in the saroglitazar group. Changes in HSI, FAST score, APRI, FIB-4, and liver stiffness were similar between groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Interpretation and conclusions In non-obese NAFLD/MASLD patients, the combination of saroglitazar with lifestyle changes over a period of six months improved insulin resistance, triglycerides, and ALT but did not confer additional benefit over lifestyle intervention alone for non-invasive hepatic steatosis or liver fibrosis markers.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverMetabolic DiseasesNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePhenylpropionatesPyrrolesAdultAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceLiverMaleMiddle AgedObesityAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesPhenylpropionatesPyrrolessaroglitazarInsulin resistanceMASLDNAFLDNon-obese NAFLDSaroglitazar

Identifiers

PMID42165726
PMCPMC13224251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.