ReviewThe FEBS journal2026
Understanding and addressing resistance to IMiDs immunomodulatory compounds in multiple myeloma.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), including lenalidomide and pomalidomide in combination with proteasome inhibitors, dexamethasone and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, play a central role in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) across newly diagnosed and relapsed stages. These treatment regimens have significantly improved patient outcomes worldwide, establishing IMiDs as one of the backbones of MM therapy. A new generation of more potent compounds called cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs) is now being developed to potentially replace the older IMiDs. In addition, novel immunotherapeutic approaches led by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T), T-cell engagers and antibody-drug conjugates are also increasingly used in relapsed and refractory myeloma patient care. However, despite these advances, resistance to IMiD-based therapies inevitably develops and represents a major clinical challenge. Understanding the biological basis of resistance to IMiD-based therapy is crucial to plan and maximise treatment options for patients when they relapse on IMiD containing regimens. Emerging evidence underscores the role of genetic and epigenetic alterations, changes in downstream signalling, and dysregulation of the bone marrow immune microenvironment in driving therapeutic resistance. In this review, we explore current literature on the molecular and immune mechanisms related to the onset of therapeutic resistance. We then suggest ways to overcome resistance and exemplify options for the future, focusing on immunotherapy combinations with IMiDs or CELMoDs and novel agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.