ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Perceived Emergency Department Avoidance Following Virtual Provider-to-Provider Consultation: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundLimited access to specialty care contributes to emergency department (ED) crowding in Canada. Virtual provider-to-provider consultation platforms may support primary care management and reduce unnecessary ED utilization. The purpose of this study was to assess primary care providers' perceptions of whether virtual peer-to-peer consultations prevented ED visits.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of post-consultation surveys completed by clinicians using the Virtual Hallway platform, an electronic consultation system enabling synchronous specialist advice to primary care providers, in Nova Scotia, Canada. Providers reported whether the consultation helped manage the patient's condition and whether it potentially prevented an ED visit. Urgency of avoided escalation was also recorded. Descriptive analyses examined responses by provider type, specialty, and geographic zone.ResultsAmong 587 respondents, 29.1% believed the consultation prevented an ED visit, 51.6% did not, and 19.3% were unsure. Perceived ED avoidance was higher in rural zones (35.0%) than in the urban Central Zone (22.4%). Among avoided visits, 9.9% were classified as highly urgent, 53.2% moderately urgent, and 36.8% not urgent. Nearly all respondents (96.3%) reported improved patient management.ConclusionsVirtual peer-to-peer consultation was perceived to prevent ED visits in nearly one-third of cases, with greater impact in rural settings. These findings suggest potential system-level benefits in reducing avoidable emergency care utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.